Compounding of Offenses Under the Companies Act, 2013: A Practical Guide for Indian Companies

Under Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013, Indian companies can settle certain legal violations by compounding offenses—paying penalties instead of facing prosecution. This article explains the statutory basis, eligibility, procedure, and strategic benefits of compounding for corporate compliance.

Under the Companies Act, 2013, Indian companies that inadvertently violate statutory obligations, such as delays in filing returns, failing to appoint key managerial personnel, or missing corporate meeting deadlines, can regularize these lapses by applying for compounding of offenses. Governed by Section 441 of the Companies Act, 2013, this mechanism allows companies or officers in default to settle offenses by paying monetary penalties and avoid lengthy legal proceedings.

Statutory basis and meaning of compounding

Compounding is a statutory mechanism that permits companies or their officers to resolve certain violations by paying a financial penalty instead of facing prosecution. It applies only to offenses that are compoundable under law, and aims to reduce litigation while promoting voluntary compliance. Once compounded, the offense is considered legally resolved.

Types of offenses under the Companies Act

The Act categorizes offenses into two primary types:

• Compoundable offenses: offenses punishable with fine only, or with fine or imprisonment or both. These can be settled through compounding; and
• Non-compoundable offenses: offenses that involve imprisonment only or imprisonment and a fine. These must go through judicial prosecution and cannot be compounded.

Eligibility to initiate compounding

Find Business Support

Simplify compliance with Corporate Secretarial services⟶

The compounding process under the Companies Act, 2013 may be initiated by the company, an officer in default, or the Registrar of Companies (RoC). This structure enables both internal and external parties to trigger the compliance rectification mechanism. It ensures that lapses are addressed promptly, whether identified voluntarily by the company or flagged by the regulatory authority, thereby promoting a culture of accountability and proactive corporate governance.

Authorized authorities and jurisdiction

Two primary authorities are empowered to handle compounding matters:

Procedure: Steps for compounding an offense

• Identify and rectify the default or non-compliance;
• Prepare the application with supporting documentation, including proof of rectification;
• File e-Form GNL-1 with the relevant Regional Director or NCLT, depending on jurisdiction;
• Follow up with the authorities on the application and attend the hearing (if required);
• Pay the compounding fee once the application is approved; and
• File the compounding order with the RoC using Form INC-28.

Common compoundable offenses

Many frequently encountered violations fall within the scope of compoundable offenses. These include:

• Delay in filing annual returns (MGT-7);
• Delay in filing financial statements (AOC-4);
• Failure to appoint a Company Secretary or Chief Financial Officer;
• Non-maintenance of statutory registers; and
• Failure to hold the Annual General Meeting (AGM) within the stipulated time.

Such offenses, though often unintentional, can carry regulatory consequences unless addressed through proper legal channels.

Advantages of compounding

Compounding presents several strategic advantages for businesses seeking to restore regulatory compliance. It enables companies to avoid the complexities and delays of prosecution by allowing them to settle certain offenses with monetary penalties. This process significantly reduces litigation time and associated costs, making it a cost-effective compliance strategy.

It also offers companies an opportunity to demonstrate transparency, accountability, and proactive governance. By resolving issues voluntarily, businesses not only improve their standing with regulators but also strengthen trust among stakeholders and financial partners. These factors make compounding an efficient and reputationally sound mechanism to address compliance lapses without disrupting operational continuity.

Regulatory developments and policy support

Find Business Support

Have a question? Contact our Business Advisory Team

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has decriminalized several procedural lapses, moving them into the compoundable category. This policy shift reflects the government’s aim to simplify compliance, reduce regulatory burden, and encourage ease of doing business in India.

The MCA’s stance has also led to greater emphasis on voluntary compliance, promoting early detection and self-correction of violations before enforcement action is initiated.

In brief

Compounding under the Companies Act, 2013, offers Indian businesses a practical path to restore compliance without triggering formal litigation. For companies that recognize and rectify their non-compliances promptly, this route not only reduces legal exposure but also reinforces ethical governance. With the MCA encouraging this route through streamlined processes and policy support, compounding has become an essential compliance tool for companies operating in India.

Read more: Capital Gains Reporting Revised Under New ITR Framework

(US$1 = INR 85.1)

• Previous Article India’s AI Infrastructure and Emerging Market Leadership: An Outlook
• Next Article 印度人工智能基础设施建设及其在新兴市场中的领导力展望